Skip to main content

Reply to this post | See parent post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Jan 27, 2012 1:08pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

Or proof once again NOTHING really new came after about 1971?

;)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: clementinescaboose Date: Jan 28, 2012 12:43am
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

Should we expect anything less?

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: duckpond74 Date: Jan 27, 2012 5:42pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

LOL!! You are incorrigible . . .

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Jan 27, 2012 6:19pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

i peaked in 71, been all downhill since

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: William Tell Date: Jan 28, 2012 12:11pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

That helps with the running though, eh?

Wish I was able to follow your lead on that biz, but too many original components have been degraded on this old model, and the replacement parts just aren't cutting it, ya know?

;)

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: rastamon Date: Jan 28, 2012 1:33pm
Forum: GratefulDead Subject: Re: Question on WRS tease at Lyceum 5/23/72

i hear you, I've had a def downswing in the last 3, so just increased the biking. I'd go with the GD into 73 tho. Sure u never worked at Home Depot? There was a deadhead there that swore the GD went downhill after Pigpen left.Like the dead, I'm more fun live - sometimes it takes Blind Faith :)

This post was modified by rastamon on 2012-01-28 21:33:13